16/07/2024

Care Health

Prioritize Healthy life

Insurance company poised to drop Canyon County’s coverage

Insurance company poised to drop Canyon County’s coverage

NAMPA, Idaho (AP) — An insurance policies firm that handles counties and other public entities in Idaho states it is not going to renew Canyon County’s insurance coverage due to the fact of rising dangers and a higher volume of promises.

The Idaho Counties Chance Administration Software, recognized as ICRMP, despatched a letter to Canyon County officers on Might 23, citing “numerous aspects which includes adverse declare progress and rising danger exposures,” the Idaho Push described. The Nampa-centered newspaper obtained the doc by means of general public records requests.

Canyon County Public Data Officer Joe Decker claimed the county’s elected officials could not right away remark due to the fact the condition is onging.


“We are functioning to evaluate all possibilities, such as opportunity renewal with ICRMP and the prospective acquisition of alternative coverage,” Decker wrote in an e mail. “More data will be forthcoming when available.”

Canyon County Commissioners responded to ICRMP in a June 2 letter that recommended the county may well attraction the non-renewal notice. They took situation with the non-renewal selection, expressing, “the abruptness and comprehensiveness of this full separation, and the lack of warning or opportunity to remedy any perceived challenge, is stunning.”

The commissioners also explained the coverage company’s documentation showing the county’s “loss history” was not correct. They reported 25 of the claims detailed are “unrelated to the county.”

They also claimed the coverage company was equating so-referred to as “nuisance settlements” — normally created when an entity decides that paying out an individual to stop a lawsuit would be more affordable or far more effortless than battling the matter in court — with actual misconduct by the county or its associates.

Tim Osborne, executive director of ICRMP, claimed in a cellphone job interview that he could not elaborate on the explanations that the board voted to non-renew the policy. He stated his office environment is operating to coordinate a meeting with Canyon County officers to overview the “documentation” of the good reasons the board voted to non-renew. Right after that conference, Canyon County officials could ask for a conference with the board in open up session about how to transfer ahead, he stated.